{"id":23,"date":"2008-08-06T21:01:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-07T02:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/?p=23"},"modified":"2008-11-06T07:55:06","modified_gmt":"2008-11-06T12:55:06","slug":"are-all-generalizations-insults","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/2008\/are-all-generalizations-insults\/","title":{"rendered":"Are all generalizations insults?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I was reading a <a href=\"http:\/\/news.slashdot.org\/news\/08\/08\/06\/1214234.shtml\">Slashdot<\/a> post today about the Olympics changing the gymnastics scoring system, when I came across the following by CmdrTaco (one of Slashdot&#8217;s primary editors):<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Now I&#8217;m sure that no Slashdot reader will intentionally watch any &#8220;sport&#8221; that has judges determine the winner, but their wives\/girlfriends might seize control of the remote because they want to know who is the best at that ribbon-twirling thing.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h3>The lesser<\/h3>\n<p>(that means jump ahead for the sexism bit)<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s two things in there that could be construed as insulting; the first I&#8217;ll tackle would be the <strong>&#8221;sport&#8221;<\/strong> air-quote.  I fully believe that there is sufficient technical ability required in gymnastics to consider it a sport.  These people do train their asses off.<\/p>\n<p>However, it is a <em>judged<\/em> sport, which does set it slightly apart from an <em>officiated<\/em> sport.  An officiated sport generally has objective rules, which a third party observer can categorically qualify.  Ball goes in hoop: 2 points.  A judged sport relies on having a very significant amount of knowledge in a panel of people, who then score the performance.  Usually, a judged sport agrees on some universally decided <em>perfect technique<\/em>, and then judges based on the comparative performance.<\/p>\n<p>I do admit that I find myself less interested in judged sports in general.  If I watch one of these Dance shows, for example, I am often befuddled by the judges&#8217; comments &#8211; a spectacular performance to them is simply mediocre to me, but something I really like, they will stomp on.  Why?  Because I don&#8217;t perceive the same things they do.  They clearly agree, at least to some extent, what the &#8216;perfect mambo&#8217; looks like.  I wouldn&#8217;t know a mambo from a tango.  One of those has roses.<\/p>\n<p>Even sports like MMA (that&#8217;s Mixed Marshal Arts) I find lacking.  Not because of a lack of action &#8211; there&#8217;s plenty of it.  There&#8217;s also lots of action in gymnastics and figure skating, though.  It&#8217;s because unless there&#8217;s an objective Knock Out, the match is judged.  I have a bit easier time telling who&#8217;s winning as opposed to dance, because usually one guy is pinned.  But that&#8217;s usually when I flip channels.  Sorry, but two dudes wrestling on a mat is not sport to <em>me<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>So what is &#8220;sport&#8221; then?  That seems to be subjective itself. However, implying that something&#8217;s not a sport, when there are people devoting their lives to what they clearly believe is a sport, does ring of bigot to me.  But hey, I&#8217;ve said some insensitive stuff myself.  Probably on this very blog.<\/p>\n<h3>And the greater<\/h3>\n<p>The more obvious slur is that about women and their obsession with ribbon-twirling things.  I&#8217;ll defend this only in saying this: he said it on fucking slashdot.  For every joke that even mildly insinuates something remotely negative about women, there&#8217;s at least three &#8220;but hey, none of us have girlfriends now, do we.&#8221;  There&#8217;s so much self-denigration, regarding gender and overall manliness, that most jests on Slashdot that come off as &#8220;macho&#8221; in any sense are <em>satirical<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Presuming from here that the crack was satirical, it would certainly be non-obvious.  Only knowing the audience and the context of Slashdot in general can you extrapolate that particular nature from that comment.  Anywhere else, and it would most definitely be blatant sexism.<\/p>\n<p>With that said, it is very likely <em>generally true<\/em> that if somebody is changing the channel to gymnastics in the house, and the candidates for doing so are one male and one female, it&#8217;s probably the female.  I know I can&#8217;t get past &#8220;So You Think You Can Dance&#8221; without <em>my<\/em> wife saying something.  Is it a generalization: yes.  Is it mandatory that &#8220;Women like watching gymnastics&#8221; is an insult?  Absolutely not.  Just like &#8220;Men like watching football&#8221; isn&#8217;t an insult either.  We all know that it&#8217;s not universally true, only generally true <em>from one&#8217;s perspective<\/em>.  I can accept that.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the rub, though: a misstep in phrasing can make a generalization sound like an insult.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Though it&#8217;s unlikely that a Slashdotter would watch a subjectively judged sport, it&#8217;s possible that their partner may be interested in the judging process of gymnastic competition.  This article will give you some knowledge in that regard.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>There!  Now it&#8217;s totally bland, and completely not worth the time to read or comment on.  You&#8217;re welcome, taco.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was reading a Slashdot post today about the Olympics changing the gymnastics scoring system, when I came across the following by CmdrTaco (one of Slashdot&#8217;s primary editors): Now I&#8217;m sure that no Slashdot reader will intentionally watch any &#8220;sport&#8221; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/2008\/are-all-generalizations-insults\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insights"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37,"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23\/revisions\/37"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padizio.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}